Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From:	Peter Berdeklis <peter AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: complex numbers, correct ??
Message-ID:	<Pine.SGI.3.91.970902102630.29054B-100000@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca>
Nntp-Posting-Host:	chinook.physics.utoronto.ca
Sender:	news AT info DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca (System Administrator)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Organization:	University of Toronto - Dept. of Physics
In-Reply-To:	<5u8stn$lk4$1@news.IAEhv.nl>
Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 1997 14:30:09 GMT
References:	<5tsl8i$ce$1 AT news DOT IAEhv DOT nl> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970827160403 DOT 12574A-100000 AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca> <3406B175 DOT 35AB AT rug DOT ac DOT be> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970829111941 DOT 7949B-100000 AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca> <5u8stn$lk4$1 AT news DOT IAEhv DOT nl>
Lines:	18
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 30 Aug 1997, Jos Bergervoet wrote:
> It is still not clear to me, whether the complex number syntax will change
> in the near future. Is the gxx-compliant syntax final? Who can reasure me?

The statement:

cout << "Complex number A = " << A;

where a is a complex type is correct according to the current draft C++
standard, so you may assume that the code will work forever (Ooh I hate 
that word :).  The code will print the complex number A in the form 

(real_part_of_A, imag_part_of_A )

---------------
Peter Berdeklis
Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Toronto

- Raw text -