From:	"John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Replacement malloc
Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 1997 20:19:25 +0000
Organization:	Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<33DCFECD.3E1D@cs.com>
References:	<199707261427 DOT AA067617244 AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> <33dcbdae DOT 175907 AT news DOT eclipse DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp107.cs.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Jason Barstow wrote:
> 
> Thanks. - I've now checked SET's malloc, but this dosn't solve
> my particular probem (power2). I'm sure _someone_ has
> or knows of another (free) malloc lib! Help please...

Your best bet, if you seriously need this sort of precision in malloc(),
is to either write one yourself for your specific needs, or adapt an
alternative memory management routine to run alongside malloc().  The
MUD server that I am working on, for example, has a complete set of
overlay routines for memory management, ones that attempt to minimize
the wastage of allocating multiple small blocks of memory.  I can give
you a URL for the source, or send you the appropriate code snippets if
you want.  It isn't hard, really, but does get complicated from time to
time, and a lot depends on what exactly you are using the memory for.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|      John M. Aldrich       | "It may be better to be a live jackal|
|       aka Fighteer I       | than a dead lion, but it is better   |
|   mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com   | still to be a live lion."            |
| http://www.cs.com/fighteer |                - Lazarus Long        |
---------------------------------------------------------------------

- Raw text -