Sender:	crough45 AT amc DOT de
Message-Id:	<97Jul8.133945gmt+0100.16649@internet01.amc.de>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 1997 12:43:42 +0100
From:	Chris Croughton <crough45 AT amc DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: interesting redir behavior

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> The `dup' calls force the new handle to refer 
> to the same file/device as the other handle, 
> but they create a new handle, they cannot be used 
> to force the new handle be 1 (or any other specific 
> number).  The numbering of handles is done by the OS.

Are you saying that DJGPP's implementation of dup2 is 
broken?  Unix dup2 (int dup2(int old, int new);) lets
you specify the new handle; if the handle is currently 
open it will close it first.  The MSDOS function 0x46
does exactly the same.  If DJGPP fails to do this then
its library is broken and this needs to go in the bug
report system.

Under all other versions of MSDOS C I've used (Borland
and MS, several versions of each) saying:

  int fd = open("...", ...);
  dup2(fd, 1);

has worked fine...

Chris C

- Raw text -