From:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Interpreted languages.
Date:	3 Jun 1997 06:17:59 GMT
Organization:	The National Capital FreeNet
Message-ID:	<5n0cun$5nh@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References:	<199706011608 DOT LAA07010 AT sendit DOT sendit DOT NoDak DOT edu> <339213E4 DOT 15095DE8 AT alcyone DOT com> <3392FBA6 DOT 2E19 AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Reply-To:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host:	freenet3.carleton.ca
Lines:	13
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In a way, machine code is interpreted by processors. So, the difference
between a compiled language like C and an interpreted one like BASIC is
actually how deeply nested interpreters are.

The next lower level thing to machine code interpreted by a CPU, is a
hardware circuit with a fixed purpose. These are even faster than compiled
code. Future computers my be hybrids with CPUs and FPGAs...
--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh

- Raw text -