Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/03/15/06:03:01
>The API is very similar, and I don't think I used any of the features
>that are specfic to Win95. The trouble with using a Borland compiler
>would be the absence of the MFC class libraries, which I used quite
>heavily. It would probably be very easy to recompile it with a 16 bit
>version of Visual C++, but rather more work to port to Borland.
>Unfortunately I don't have access to any 16 bit Windows compilers, so I
>can't help you with this myself, but I'd be happy to answer whatever
>questions you have if you feel like attempting it yourself...
I _do_ have a copy of the old 16bit visual C++ and would be prepared to port
ttf2pcx for that environment if there is a need (not that I ever use it
myself, but sometime I might need a favour so it cant hurt to offer).
However, if you have Win3.1 and a Win95 executable why cant you just install
win32s to allow the 32 bit code to run (this _doesnt_ work for WinSock
client code but works for most else...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Dixon
Software Engineer, Dept of Paediatrics Telephone: (+44) 171 725 6258
St Mary's Hospital Medical School Fax: (+44) 171 725 6284
Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK Email: p DOT dixon AT ic DOT ac DOT uk
A Constituent College of
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Raw text -