From:	timolmst AT cyberramp DOT net
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gcc compiles so slow?
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 1997 14:13:20 GMT
Organization:	CyberRamp.net, Dallas, TX (214) 340-2020/(817) 226-2020 for info
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<5f43up$dno$4@newshost.cyberramp.net>
References:	<199612171748 DOT MAA13875 AT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pm3-13.cyberramp.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>You can't extrapolate from such a small sample (one test).  You need
>to compile a larger source also to determine what the static overhead
>is.  For example, Borland might be 0.1 sec/line, but DJGPP might be
>0.05 sec/line plus 8 seconds of overhead.

I think that we're all missing the point here. I personaly can't tell
the difference between .1 sec, and .05 sec. Try developong a little
patience. Good thinks come to those who wait.

I have several C compilers; 2 Borland, and 2 Microsuck's, in addition
to the DJGPP. I don't use any of them, except for teh DJGPP. Just TRY
asking Borland, or Microsuks, for free tech support. HAH! They'll ask
you "What kind of funny ciggarettes have you been smoking?"

- Raw text -