From:	71231 DOT 104 AT compuserve DOT com (Richard Slobod)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Rhide or Emacs or
Date:	Sun, 23 Feb 1997 05:45:31 GMT
Organization:	Warwick Online
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<330fd4f5.6371354@news.warwick.net>
References:	<m0vxvtP-000S1vC AT natacha DOT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	m252-04.warwick.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT edu DOT ar> wrote:

>> David Jenkins wrote:

>> Somebody will probably get upset, but I like to use DOS' edit.com.  It
>> has all of the search features that I ever use, including search,
>> replace, mutiple files, and carried indentation.  I use a small
>> emacs-like program called "M" for makefiles.  I have no idea where I
>> picked this up from, however.
>> 
>I'm not "upset", I'm just making some aclarations:
>1) The tools that you are using are just fine for a 386 with 4Mb, but I have a 
>Cx586 of 120MHz and 32Mb of memory so I can use more powerfull and productive 
>tools, I'm not saying that all the people can.

There are far more powerful editors than EDIT that will run on a 386
with 4MB.  For that matter, there are far more powerful editors than
EDIT that will run on an 8088 with 640K.

- Raw text -