From:	kagel AT quasar DOT bloomberg DOT com
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:52:26 -0500
Message-Id:	<9702202052.AA04711@quasar.bloomberg.com >
To:	aho450s AT nic DOT smsu DOT edu
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<330b88bb.2655095@ursa.smsu.edu> (aho450s@nic.smsu.edu)
Subject:	Re: C compilers on mainframes
Reply-To:	kagel AT dg1 DOT bloomberg DOT com

   Errors-To: postmaster AT ns1
   From: aho450s AT nic DOT smsu DOT edu (Tony O'Bryan)
   Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
   Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 23:12:54 GMT
   Organization: Southwest Missouri State University
   Lines: 1
   Nntp-Posting-Host: forseti.i97.smsu.edu
   X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230
   Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
   Content-Type: text
   Content-Length: 60

   Do C compilers exist for mainframe computers?  If not, why?

The simple answer is yes.  WhiteSmiths had a "C" compiler which was the delivered
C compiler for IBM mainframes years ago.  Several years ago IBM finally got around 
to writing their own and WhiteSmiths' compilers became an independent product.  

About other 'mainframes', that depends on what you mean by mainframe.  Prime had
C for their machines, even rewrite their FORTRAN OS code in it, before they went 
belly up.  Same for Wang.  DEC had C for the VAX and still has it for Alpha on 
all three OSs that it supports.

-- 
Art S. Kagel, kagel AT quasar DOT bloomberg DOT com

A proverb is no proverb to you 'till life has illustrated it.  -- John Keats

- Raw text -