Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:41:07 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Jan Hubicka <hubicka AT ta DOT jcu DOT cz>
cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, itmiller AT dra DOT hmg DOT gb, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Exact timming II
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.970217141758.32046D-100000@tabor.ta.jcu.cz>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.970217153938.18258C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Mon, 17 Feb 1997, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > uclock() will give negative numbers if the OS prevents it from
> > reprogramming the timer chip (or resets it).  The default clocking
>
> so allegro problems are caused by reseting timer? So in case I will start 
> timing after I will init allegro timers everything should work?

Not necessarily.  Windows itself may reset the clock from time to time.  
A program that uses the speaker to play sounds may also (if it runs in 
the background under Windows).

- Raw text -