Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/02/17/07:49:43
On Fri, 14 Feb 1997, Chad Molina wrote:
> Why not Isolate the section you are wanting to time, then run through
> it 1000 or so times. Like this
I can't do that because it is just small part of calculation and it time
differs (it is getting slower when you are zoomed in..)
Honza
>
> (Ugly pseudocode follows ; \ )
>
> Get Start time
>
> for i=0,1000
> {
> draw or whatever
> }
>
> Get Stop time
>
> Approx time = (Stop time - Start time) / 1000
>
> Maybe this will help.
>
> Chad J. Molina
>
>
> >Jan Hubicka <hubicka AT atrey DOT karlin DOT mff DOT cuni DOT cz> wrote:
>
> >>I have small problem:
> >>XaoS needs to quite exactly time one part of program. (Uses it to calculate
> >>framerate: time*5 so for framerate 30 I need to know time in precisity 1/150sec.
> >>) higher precisity is better.
> >>Gettimeofday(I using in unix) is not exact enought (1/18.2sec...4 or inf frames
> >>per second)
>
> >>What is the best way to time this? Only I know about is to attach timer, set
> >>it to higher rate and make some my own counter. Can some send me code for this?
> >>Since I am lazy to study all irq attaching stuff under dpmi. Last time I did
> >>this is about 5 years ago in assembly.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you browsed my www pages? Look at:
http://www.paru.cas.cz/~hubicka
Koules-the game for Svgalib,X11 and OS/2, Xonix-the game for X11
czech documentation for linux index, original 2D computer art and
funny 100 years old photos and articles are there!
- Raw text -