From:	frenchc AT cadvision DOT com (Calvin French)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: hello world
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 1997 19:23:31 GMT
Organization:	CADVision Development Corp.
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<5e11a0$479u@elmo.cadvision.com>
References:	<5draph$fhk$2 AT thor DOT atcon DOT com> <33020EB6 DOT 660F AT rt DOT e-technik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de> <3302C702 DOT 15FB AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ts13ip217.cadvision.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Thomas Demmer <demmer AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De> wrote:

>Right, but is this not a bug? I thought that the extension .cc
>makes gcc think it is a C++ program. And under C++ prototypes
>are required, otherwise an error should be generated (Which 
>is, IMHO, the right punishment for not using prototypes, even
>in plain C ;-) So, where am I wrong?

I think what Georg was saying (am I following this thread right) is
something along the lines of:

"Hey! Wise up, punk! You need #include <stdio.h> if you expect to use
printf()"

=)

gcc is complaining about the prototype for printf() being missing,
isn't it?

On the other hand, if this were really the case I don't see how this
program could produce any kind of executable, unless I missed
something back there. Hm.

- Calvin -

- Raw text -