To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: ellipses at an angle
Message-ID:	<19970204.171825.4847.2.chambersb@juno.com>
References:	<199702041509 DOT KAA00551 AT delorie DOT com>
	<5d87i3$7cj$1 AT troll DOT powertech DOT no>
From:	chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date:	Tue, 04 Feb 1997 20:17:04 EST

On Tue, 04 Feb 1997 10:59:51 GMT ovek AT arcticnet DOT no (Ove Kaaven) writes:
>Maybe you're too much into analytic geometry. If you replace the 1
>with any constant value, his first definition is exact. Not quite
>suitable for any computer algorithm, true, but still
>mathematically/geometrically exact.

Just for the record, the equation they taught us had some scalars in it
or something to make it come out to one all the time.  Don't ask me why -
that teacher is really messed up sometimes.

...Chambers

- Raw text -