From:	mrkite AT cyberjunkie DOT com (Marco Salvalaggio)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Serious djgpp problem with exceptions ?
Date:	Sun, 02 Feb 1997 13:32:27 GMT
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<32fa975c.5688148@news.ind.mh.se>
References:	<32f93129 DOT 6685902 AT news DOT ind DOT mh DOT se> <32f3bbc4 DOT 53222 AT seashell DOT california DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pgw-082.mclink.it
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Sun, 02 Feb 1997 01:06:46 GMT, billlanam AT california DOT com (Bill Lanam)
wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Feb 1997 12:04:11 GMT, mrkite AT cyberjunkie DOT com (Marco Salvalaggio)
>wrote:
>
>> [snip..]
>>   try
>>   {
>>      f2();
>>   }
>>   catch( MyExcept& x )	// This one not ok. The program aborts.
>if changed to catch '(MyOtherExcept& x)' it then works.
>
>> [snip..]

Yes Bill, I know that. But the point is that I would like to catch it as a
base class object since in my original app. I don't know exactly what kind
of particular exception will be thrown, that's why I've created my own
hierarchy of exception classes. I think that this is one of the most
important task accomplished by exception mechanism, at least it saves me
quite a lot of coding.

At the moment I don't remember where, but I've read that the djgpp
implementation of exceptions is under development and maybe this feature is
still missing. If so I have to wait before switch from Borland to djgpp.

>
>    Bill Lanam

Thanks for your reply, anyway.

Marco.

- Raw text -