www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/02/02/02:18:58

From: afn03257 AT freenet2 DOT afn DOT org (Daniel P Hudson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: OpenDOS
Date: 1 Feb 1997 18:01:23 GMT
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <5d00dj$2k5@huron.eel.ufl.edu>
Reply-To: afn03257 AT afn DOT org"Dan"
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet2.afn.org
NNTP-Posting-User: afn03257
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

"Weiqi Gao" <weiqigao AT crl DOT com> wrote:
>Daniel P Hudson <afn03257 AT freenet3 DOT afn DOT org> wrote in article
><5cp4fl$evh AT huron DOT eel DOT ufl DOT edu>...

>>No, it was that harmless. It said, clear as day, your OS is not
>>MS-DOS, ergo we do not guarentee windows will run as stated, you need
>>to ensure it is 100% MSDOS compatable. That sums it up to a T.
>>Now, guess what? Some DOS's were not 100% MS-DOS compatable even
>>though they claimed it. Novell DOS was never fully MS-DOS compatable,
>>yet it said it was on the box.

>OK Dan, get a cut of coffee, because you need to wake up a little bit.

 I don't drink coffee.

>Take a look into the ring:  Here on the left side is the heavy weight
>from Seattle, MS-DOS;  And on the right side, from the home town of
>CP/M, is DR DOS.  They both are operating systems for the IBM PC.

>Now tell me, who should be compatible with whom?

 Depends, if I want MS-DOS to run apps designed for DR. DOS then MS-DOS 
 should be compatable with DR.DOS, but Gates didn't want this.
 IF I wanted to run MS-DOS based apps using DR. DOS then DR. DOS should 
 be MS-DOS compatible, and that's what they wanted, they wanted to run 
 Windows which was designed to run on MS-DOS. Listen to yourself for a 
 minute. You are suggesting Gates ignore his own OS an go out of his way 
 to make windows run on a clone of DOS, which he DID. Had it of been me,
 I'd of ID'd the dos version, if it was incorrect, I'd of just said
 ERROR: Imroper DOS version. However, MS coded a routine to specifically
 determine that the version was wrong but the OS wasn't MS-DOS and
 instaead of refusing to run windows, it warned about possible
 incompatabilities. Seems pretty fair to me. I don't suspect you
 can run programs for AIX on other Unix implementations and get 
 anything similar, can you? Without special extensions that is.

>An DOS application (which Windows was at the time) have no business
>telling the user which DOS they should use.

 I see, so if my application depended on remapping KEYS using MS's
 ANSI.SYS I have no business mentioning this, and I should just let
 them run the program and crash repeatedly being utterly clueless
 as to why, correct? then whyn they call me, I should tell them to
 call the manufacturer of their ANSI driver and ask them to determine
 why. Yeah, there is customer suport for you. Unlike your ideas of what
 MS should have done there, it preferred to make a profit and did just
 that.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019