From:	Robert Vasquez <digital DOT fx AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP vs Borland C++
Date:	Sat, 01 Feb 1997 03:25:16 -0500
Organization:	Digital Fx
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<32F2FDEC.AA3@worldnet.att.net>
References:	<199701291250 DOT HAA05157 AT freenet2 DOT freenet DOT ufl DOT edu>
	<E4sLLu DOT 2Iw AT boss DOT cs DOT ohiou DOT edu> <5cubtu$13n AT huron DOT eel DOT ufl DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.147.48.45
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>  Linux is obviously not for me. Maybe I'll try FreeBSD, or the Que
>  Linux CD-ROM one day. Que book+products always seem to work well
>  for me. However, I'm not going to claim Linux is an absolute piece
>  of junk. Now, are you going to claim Borland's is because you
>  couldn't get it working right? Only if your 3 years old maybe.

Well, sorry to break it to ya, but other than maybe Symantec, Borland's 
C/C++ products are about the worst. Their glory days of TurboC 3.1 are 
over man . . .

> >What planet are you from?
> 
> You might want to answer this one yourself after your two false
> assumptions there, Mac. I have patched commercial software using debug
> before, it is POSSIBLE! In fact, I patched EDIT using ASCII coding
> techniques for machine code in EDIT. It is utterly amazing what one 
> do when one is determined. Granted I would have preferred HLL src code
> to patch, I got the task accomplished just the same.

What exactly did you patch? Sounds kinda funny to me

-- 
               Rob Vasquez
               Digital Fx '97
               
   email:   digital DOT fx AT worldnet DOT att DOT net

- Raw text -