From:	"r. v. paasen" <R DOT L DOT F DOT v DOT Paasen AT stud DOT tue DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: What's all the hype about OpenDOS
Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 1997 01:16:10 +0100
Organization:	Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines:	42
Message-ID:	<32EBF3CA.555B@stud.tue.nl>
References:	<01bc0982$bf838fc0$ea038cd0 AT wahander> <32eb46da DOT 1592039 AT news DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	R DOT L DOT F DOT v DOT Paasen AT stud DOT tue DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Host:	annex1s21.urc.tue.nl
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Alaric B. Williams wrote:
> 
> On 23 Jan 1997 23:16:08 GMT, "Josh Anderson" <randerso AT win DOT bright DOT net>
> wrote:
> 
> >What's all the hype about OpenDOS
> 
> At a guess, the timeline will be something like this:
> 
> OpenDOS sources and binaries released. People ditch their pirate
> copies of DOS6.0 and use the Caldera binaries.
> 
> Hacker dudes d/l the sources and each of them designs a new
> extension-API 32 bit DOS by hacking EMM386 and the kernel.
> 
> Millions of incompatible variations emerge and swirl around like
> things that swirl around.
> 
> A few really fast or powerful 32 bit DOS+ architectures emerge, yet
> are still basically incompatible. API libraries for DJGPP and other 32
> bit compilers are written to access these.
> 
> Then, in parallel:
> 
>  - A DJGPP API is written that autodetects the installed DOS+ and uses
> the appropriate fast 32 bit I/O API, but can only use shared
> functionality.
> 
>  - A new DOS+ is written that provides all 3 or 4 prevelant APIs.
> 
> ABW


Grinn... I guess that the guys from the FreeWin95 
project are going to build their OS on OpenDos.
Just going to wait and see what happens.

RvP 
-------------------------------------------
email: <mailto:R DOT L DOT F DOT v DOT Paasen AT stud DOT tue DOT nl>
www:   <http://huizen.dds.nl/~buddha/>
SENDING UNSOLICITED MAIL AND JUNK MAIL IS PROHIBITED

- Raw text -