Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/01/27/03:40:33
<SANDMANN AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> wrote:
>I have no plans at this point to make further changes to CWSDPMI (there
>are no confirmed bugs that I know of, and the missing feature set is small,
>and there are easy workarounds for those). And I don't use DOS anymore.
>The code can be re-compiled (with a change in dalloc.h) to support up to
>2Gb of virtual memory (if you have that much disk). This will greatly
>increase the resident size of the executing CWSDPMI image (potentially to
>the point where the small model breaks).
>I did do some testing almost 2 years ago with 512Mb of memory configured,
>and it seemed to run OK, but I didn't have that much time to test it
>rigorously (512Mb on a 16Mb machine is S L O W . . .)
When you write 2Gb of virtual memory, what is the ratio RAM/HD in this
case? And is it easy to change dalloc.h?
Thanks.
Victor Fesenko.
fesenko AT pacific DOT net DOT sg
- Raw text -