Date:	Thu, 16 Jan 1997 08:40:42 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Alexander Lehmann <lehmann AT mathematik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why two identical typedef are considered an error in DJGPP?
In-Reply-To:	<5bh88d$79r@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.970116083846.16632F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On 15 Jan 1997, Alexander Lehmann wrote:

> Actually, I think this is correct in ANSI, maybe other compilers have
> `softened' the definition a bit (which causes highly unportable
> programs, of course).

No, the real problem (AFAIK) is that most of the other compilers just 
don't warn about identical definitions, unless you turn on an option that 
makes them more touchy.  GCC's default diagnostics is better, that's all.

- Raw text -