To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Intel ASM Possible
Message-ID:	<19970104.200104.4567.0.chambersb@juno.com>
References:	<32CEF7D5 DOT 32F2 AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
From:	chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date:	Sat, 04 Jan 1997 22:55:44 EST

On Sat, 04 Jan 1997 16:37:41 -0800 Dan Mintz <danmintz AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
writes:
>Hello,
>
>	I simply can not believe that DJGPP doesn't support Intel 
>assembly
>code, and all it supports is AT&T code.
Why not?  I started out on Intel, and I agree AT&T is better.

> Well does anyone know of a
>program that can convert Intel ASM to AT&T asm?
Use NASM - it uses Intel syntax, and is compatible with DJGPP.

> Because I am NOT up 
>for
>learning another language.
Don't have to.  It's the same language (you might notice, people use the
word 'syntax'.  This doesn't mean it's a different language).  The only
difference is in the way you type it - generally, Intel is
<blah>  <dest>,  <src>
While AT&T is
<blah>  <src>,   <dest
Which is a lot easier, 'cause it's the way people read (unless you're
reading in Hebrew {Did you know the English language is written
backwards?})

...Chambers

- Raw text -