From:	beppu AT rigel DOT oac DOT uci DOT edu (John Beppu)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: assembler
Date:	2 Jan 1997 21:07:35 GMT
Organization:	University of California, Irvine
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<5ah82n$kdg@news.service.uci.edu>
References:	<32C7CD0C DOT 5B96 AT netime DOT com> <32CC1067 DOT 62C7 AT concentric DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	rigel.oac.uci.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <32CC1067 DOT 62C7 AT concentric DOT net>,

>Why not use NASM to make functions .o ?
>Its intell syntax... but you cant 'inline' with it.


  I'd also endorse NASM as a good option for people wanting to
  write Intel-styled assembly for use w/ DJGPP.  Although NASM
  lacks any macro facilities, using NASM in combination with 
  CPP can fix that problem easily.

  It's my opinion that NASM is the best free assembler for the
  x86 available at the moment.  If you give it a chance, I think
  you'll find that NASM is a well designed assembler suitable 
  for real work.


-- 
  beppu AT uci DOT edu .............................................................

- Raw text -