From:	lonniem AT nol DOT net
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: assembler
Date:	Tue, 31 Dec 1996 04:36:13 GMT
Organization:	Networks On-Line
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<5a9u8t$2i4$3@news.nol.net>
References:	<32C7CD0C DOT 5B96 AT netime DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ip38-1.nol.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

derek greene <topcoder AT netime DOT com> wrote:

>has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
>intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
>it for me and it is starting to piss me off
That's what I used to think but now I'm used to it and actually like
it better than Intel syntax.  It doesn't take that long to get
re-adjusted.  Just reverse the order of all operands and add $'s to
constants.....etc...

Lonnie McCullough
lonniem AT mail DOT utexas DOT edu

- Raw text -