From:	"John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: assembler
Date:	Mon, 30 Dec 1996 18:28:24 -0800
Organization:	Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<32C87A48.6771@cs.com>
References:	<32C7CD0C DOT 5B96 AT netime DOT com>
Reply-To:	fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp108.cs.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

derek greene wrote:
> 
> has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
> intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
> it for me and it is starting to piss me off

It's just a question of learning the new syntax.  Most users who use
AT&T syntax have found it to be superior to Intel once they get used to
it.  Try looking in the FAQ and the as docs for instructions on the AT&T
syntax, and check out Brennan's Guide to Inline ASM at
<http://www.rt66.com/~brennan/djgpp/djgpp_asm.html>.  It's _the_
reference for DJGPP users.  ;)

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I  |        fighteer AT cs DOT com         |
| Plan:  To find ANYONE willing to |   http://www.cs.com/fighteer   |
| play Descent 2 on DWANGO!        | Tagline: <this space for rent> |
---------------------------------------------------------------------

- Raw text -