Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/12/13/05:55:33
Patrick / Albert Fong wrote:
>
> To any DJGPP user:
>
> Could you help me decide if I should get Watcom C/C++ 10.6 or this
> current version of DJGPP?
>
> Basically, I want to move up to a 32-bit compiler (I'm stuck with
> TC 3.0 for DOS (eeeeewwww....) ) and I can't decide which to get.
>
> Will Watcom be worth the money, or is DJGPP just like it?
>
> Thanks to all in advance!
I don't think Watcom's worth it.
They usually say gcc is the best C compiler around coz it makes faster
and smaller code and with less chances to get an error.
Considering DJGPP is a port of gcc,I think it's better than watcom.
--
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' com
http://www.cam.org/~tudor
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d(-)@>-- s-()>+:(+)>- a--- C+(++)>+++>$ ULC(+)@>++++
P+(+)>++++>$
L(+)>+++++>$ E-(--)?>++ W++(++)>+++>$ N(+)@>+++ o(-)?>+
K---(----)?>-
w(---)@>-- !O--(----)>++ !M(+)>- V--(-)?>-- PS--(-)?>+++ !PE(+)>-
Y(+)>++>$ PGP+(++)>++++>$ t---(+++)@>+++ !5(-)>-- X++(+++)>$>++++
R+()>+++>$ tv(+)@>++ b+(++)?>+++ DI-(--)?>--- !D(+)>+++ G++(+)@
e-()>++++>$ h(--)?>++ !r(--)?>+++ !y(--)>+++++@
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Raw text -