From:	weiqigao AT crl DOT com (Weiqi Gao)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Bash and less questions.
Date:	Fri, 06 Dec 1996 20:58:31 GMT
Organization:	CRL Dialup Internet Access
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<58a1ih$8ir@nexp.crl.com>
References:	<Pine DOT BSI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961205005021 DOT 26200D-100000-100000-100000-100000 AT msn DOT globaldialog DOT com> <19961205 DOT 222525 DOT 12343 DOT 1 DOT Praxis_Beta AT juno DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	crl9.crl.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

praxis_beta AT juno DOT com (Bruce A Locke) wrote:

>I'm sorry to ask stupid questions like this but I have just completed the
>process of getting a new e-mail account so I lost a few day's worth of
>e-mail in the interm.  *8-)

>My questions is:  

>There is a BASH shell for DOS?
>If so, why?  Just for the fun of it or is their a real need for it?

Yes, the bash shell has been ported to DOS.

The most obvious reason for having a bash shell is to run all the sh
scripts out there, thus easing the porting pain of Unix programs to
DOS.

The porting process must have been fun.  Using it certainly is.

--
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao AT crl DOT com

- Raw text -