From:	mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: random #'s
Date:	Mon, 02 Dec 1996 18:04:51 GMT
Organization:	Oxford University
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<32a319f8.2224829@news.ox.ac.uk>
References:	<01BBDE40 DOT 57785E00 AT sky38 DOT dataplusnet DOT com> <329FF108 DOT 7ED4 AT cs DOT com> <32a28934 DOT 29578785 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <01bbe053$bf5d70e0$010200c0 AT weiqigao>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mc31.merton.ox.ac.uk
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 2 Dec 1996 13:23:05 GMT, "Weiqi Gao" <weiqigao AT crl DOT com> wrote:

>Of cause, for random number generators, tests are not enough.  A
>mathematical proof is a must.

Yes, but that would require a knowledge of the random number algorithm
being used internally... which is, of course, possible by looking at
the source code, but then you might just as well write your own :)

George Foot

- Raw text -