Sender:	root AT sympatico DOT ca
Message-ID:	<32A6CAB0.51E99356@sympatico.ca>
Date:	Thu, 05 Dec 1996 08:14:24 -0500
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT sympatico DOT ca>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"A. Kunigelis" <algikun AT santaka DOT sc-uni DOT ktu DOT lt>
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Idea for powerful IDE
References:	<32A0FD87 DOT 66AA AT nlc DOT net DOT au> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 961202140812 DOT 26360F-100000 AT santaka DOT sc-uni DOT ktu DOT lt>

A. Kunigelis wrote:
> 
> >
> >       Considering people are thinking of porting RHIDE to Win95/97..
> >
> 
> Is that really true??? How come people keep talking about what crapp
> Windows is and then still put effort in it??? Why isn't porting RHIDE to
> Linux a primary project? Linux definitely needs a good IDE for gcc,
> because the old WPE is.. old? And there's a version of TurboVision for
> Linux, too!

Agreed, XWPE is not that great.  When doing Native linux programming, I
usually use 'joe' for editing, or I run BOXER in DOSemu (it lets you
save UNIX text files).  However a GOOD IDE for Text mode and X is
definately needed!!!!!!!!!  XWPE in any carnation *LOCKS HARD* on my
machine.

Mike

- Raw text -