From:	"Balial" <lamer AT somewhere DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Ideas for DJGPP.
Date:	2 Dec 1996 06:05:08 GMT
Organization:	Customer of Access One Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
Lines:	59
Message-ID:	<01bbdfb2$704407e0$794f12cb@osborne-1>
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 961111075629 DOT 21834A-100000 AT sparrow DOT qut DOT edu DOT au> <3286978F DOT 714F AT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au> <329CDC2B DOT 1B5F AT cam DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pppc21.nectar.com.au
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Apparently-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org> wrote in article <329CDC2B DOT 1B5F AT cam DOT org>...
> Leath Muller wrote:
> > As for showing the differences between the major compilers, I really
> > have
> > to ask why? If someone isn't coding in Ansi C, it must be assumed that
> > they have a rough idea of what they are coding. If they understand and
> > know
> > what they are coding, such as inline asm, it is generally easy to move
> > between the differing compilers... well, I found this anyway...
> > 
> > > This is the reason that most newcomers go to a comercial compiler.
> > 
> > The reason most people go to a commercial compiler is: Quality. People
> > expect quality out of something they pay for. As I have found out, when
> > it comes to compilers - this is crap. Borland sux _BIG_ time. DJGPP is
> > free, and most people have the attitude "Ha! Free? Must be crap!" which
> > is completely incorrect on the part of DJGPP, this is the best compiler
> > I have ever used in respect to: customer support, backup, and
> > assistance...
> > :)
> > 
> > Leathal.
> Well,some comments:
> I don't really think Borland __sux__ at compilers,just at the windoze
> version 4.0.
> I also think Borland's Turbo C++ is very good(and even better than
> djgpp) for a newcomer to programming or C/C++.
> Don't get me wrong,djgpp is by far better and more complex than turbo
> C++,but for a newcomer,djgpp's complexity can really be confusing.
> 

I beg to differ,
	Borland couldn't write a stable _and_ easy to use program to save
their lives. DJGPP is undoubtedly the best C/C++ compiler I have ever
seen and or used and it is not complex. The only 'hard' part about it,
for want of a better word, is the help that accompanies it (But that's
not the compiler is it?). When I need assistance I usually look up my
good ol' MS C6.0 function help, even though it it old and outdated it 
still has what I need and cross references. If DJGPP had this it would
be _slightly_ better, but it is still the best.

	Balial


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
At Windows, quality is job 1.1

From the BaLiAl!

balial AT mailhost DOT net
balial AT resrocket DOT com
balial AT nectar DOT com DOT au
balial AT ozemail DOT com DOT au

http://www.ozemail.com.au/~balial
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

- Raw text -