From:	deadgame AT EriNet DOT com
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DOES ANYBODY PLAN TO MAKE RHIDE 95?
Date:	Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:14:14 GMT
Organization:	EriNet Online 513 436-1700 (Voice)
Lines:	34
Distribution:	oh, wv, in, mi, ar, al, nc, sc, mo, io,
Message-ID:	<32a297a3.1287400@nntp2.erinet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dlp12.spring.eri.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Fri, 29 Nov 1996 14:44:37 +0300 (GMT),"Salvador Eduardo Tropea
(SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar> babbled:

>>1) Robert will not port the TVision lib to WIn95, is a huge work.
So you are under the impression that TVision is required to make a
quality IDE?  

>>2) What adavantage you'll get? 

Seamless integration into the environment that I prefer to work in.

>>a) Slowers.
>>b) Greaters.
>>c) Less confortable for the eyes.

subject to debate... 

>>d) More complex to do.
also subject to debate.  

>>If you know some advantage of a "RHIDE 95" tell me.
As I said before it would make things easier for me because I like
being able to resize windows and bounce back in fourth between
programming and other tasks.  I also prefer the look and feel of the
Win95 interface (god help me) ...

>>If you have 1000 hours/man (or more) to port TVision to Win95 tell me too ;-).

Well, since TV is pretty much obsolete, and was never really loved
when it was the latest, greatest, I seriously doubt it is necessary.
Besides I have already talked to Robert and told him I may take on the
task (using Borland Delphi) once I fully understand all that Rhide
does.   It won't be called Rhide though. 

- Raw text -