From:	Bill Lachance <billl AT synapse DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Future of Allegro (?)
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 1996 18:43:58 -0800
Organization:	Synapse Internet [www.synapse.net]
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<3292706D.5F84@synapse.net>
References:	<848353079 DOT 23065 AT dejanews DOT com> <848429582 DOT 9871 AT dejanews DOT com>
Reply-To:	billl AT synapse DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Host:	harp-22.synapse.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

mushashi AT geocities DOT com wrote:
> 
> X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Nov 19 19:04:09 1996 GMT
> X-Originating-IP-Addr: 192.176.234.203 ()
> X-Authenticated-Sender: mushashi AT geocities DOT com
> Lines: 13
> Xref: news.synapse.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:12903
> 
>     mushashi AT geocities DOT com wrote:
> >      This also gives a slight performance improvement if your computer has
> >      hardware support for floating point maths.
> >      The real issue is to make allegro use the math processor if there is one.
> I checked better today.The above was based on some very quick tests.
> Some of the routines in the fixed point math part of allegro seems to be very
> good even compared with math processors.

I think that's because Allegro uses look-up tables for most of its trig
functions, which would of course make them very fast. 

Bill Lachance
billl AT synapse DOT net

- Raw text -