From:	Eric Christopherson <Draximus AT fab DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: cross-compiling: FROM linux TO msdos
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 1996 15:55:30 -0600
Organization:	WorldWide Access (tm) - Chicagoland Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com)
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<32922CD2.1233@fab.net>
References:	<Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 961117093949 DOT 1369A-100000 AT gibson DOT eee DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph> <56qh44$peo AT sun-cc204 DOT lboro DOT ac DOT uk>
Reply-To:	Draximus AT fab DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.152.82.102
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

James Soutter wrote:
> 
> Orlando Andico (orly AT gibson DOT eee DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph) wrote:
> 
> : If what you want is a Linux-hosted GCC which outputs DOS binaries, then
> : look no further than MOSS ("a soft blanket over the rocky slopes of DOS").
> :
> : [...]
> :
> : Honestly I haven't tried MOSS myself, as I work mostly in a UNIX
> : environment and for my rare forays into DOS I use DJGPP because that's
> : what I've always used.
> 
> I tried MOSS.  I wasn't impressed.  Under MOSS, my program ran for a
> bit and then dumped core.  Before crashing, my program produced some
> output that was messed up because '\n' wasn't mapped to '\n\r'
> properly.
> 
> I'll stick to using a DJGPP based cross compiler.  DJGPP seems to be
> much more reliable.
> 
> -- James
There is an EMX GCC for Linux that outputs DOS exes.

-- 
+-- -  -        .      .x
|  Eric Christopherson  |
x.      .        -  - --+

- Raw text -