From:	muel0115 AT gold DOT tc DOT umn DOT edu (John Muellerleile)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP-win32 vs. Delphi
Date:	18 Nov 1996 21:09:23 GMT
Organization:	University of Minnesota
Lines:	37
Message-ID:	<56qja3$4g7@epx.cis.umn.edu>
References:	<TCPSMTP DOT 16 DOT 11 DOT 14 DOT -15 DOT 5 DOT 6 DOT 3180191682 DOT 492686 AT formnet-svr DOT form-net DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pub-21-b-202.dialup.umn.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article 
<TCPSMTP DOT 16 DOT 11 DOT 14 DOT -15 DOT 5 DOT 6 DOT 3180191682 DOT 492686 AT formnet-svr DOT form-net DOT com>, 
lnwdt AT form-net DOT com says...
>
>(in reply to "Adding windows support?")
>
>Hello,
>
>I was just wondering, will this DJGPP-win32 be
>better than Borland's Delphi?  From what I have
>seen from Delphi, it is quite fast.  I know that
>Delphi is more pascal-like, and I have not
>tested RSXNT yet (because I do not have NT or
>'95) and I have read that it is not free.
>

I have dabbled a bit using RSXNTDJ and to be honest
it's functional, but its kinda picky about some
things and is nothing compared to the functionality
of MSdevStudio or anything like that (imagine that?)
But it _is_ functional and does work (I have used it
under NT 3.51)

>Regards.
>Leon
>
>-:----------------------:-
> :  Leon Nieuwoudt      :
> :  lnwdt AT form-net DOT com  :
>-:----------------------:-
>
>

John M Muellerleile
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN

- Raw text -