From:	Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Q: Typedef riddle
Date:	Sat, 16 Nov 1996 13:52:47 -0800
Organization:	Alcyone Systems
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<328E37AF.44440CB8@alcyone.com>
References:	<328DD331 DOT 26E4 AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Elliott Oti wrote:

> It's not a gcc bug because Borland gives a similar output,
> but -Wall gives absolutely no warnings. So what's wrong?

Operator precedence; John Aldrich answered that question.

There's another issue, though -- you don't _need_ to be passing the address
of the variable of type thing.  A thing is typedef to be an array of ints,
and an array is passed as a pointer.  Just pass the variable itself.

-- 
                             Erik Max Francis | max AT alcyone DOT com
                              Alcyone Systems | http://www.alcyone.com/max/
                         San Jose, California | 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W
                                 &tSftDotIotE | R^4: the 4th R is respect
         "But since when can wounded eyes see | If we weren't who we were"

- Raw text -