From:	bdarnell AT vnet DOT net (Ben Darnell)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Future of Allegro (?)
Date:	Thu, 14 Nov 1996 21:13:18 GMT
Organization:	Vnet Internet Access, Inc.
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<56g1ti$3ii@ralph.vnet.net>
References:	<56eaj0$ap2 AT catapult DOT gatech DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	vts-char7-s4.vnet.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

gt4558a AT acmex DOT gatech DOT edu (Rubicant) was overheard mumbling
incoherently about Future of Allegro (?):

>2)  More importantly, Allegro is basically stuck where it is.  Mind you,
>it's got ALOT of functionality and great features as it is, but for it to
>remain as is is a shame.  What do the rest of you think of someone
>temporarily taking over the maintanance of Allegro till we hear from Shawn
>again?  I can't do it personally (Shawn was a much better coder than I
>currently am), but I do think it would be beneficial - Allegro is quite
>popular and useful.  Would anyone be interested in making unofficial
>Allegro releases?  Do any of you think that Shawn would mind?  (I'm
>guessing not)

I volunteer to take over the maintainance.  I don't have time to add
many new features, but I can upload new versions so we don't have to
hear about bank.s anymore ;).  In fact, I'll be uploading a new
version to x2ftp in a few minutes.  If anyone has any proposals for
new features, email me.


     __                         __
 /> /_ /| /   /\  /|  />  /| / /_ /  /
/> /_ / |/   /_/ /-| / \ / |/ /_ /_ /_
http://users.vnet.net/bdarnell
bdarnell AT vnet DOT net

- Raw text -