Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/11/14/15:08:34
From: | "Dr. András Sólyom" <solyom AT eik DOT bme DOT hu>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: Future of Allegro
|
Date: | Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:38:07 +0100
|
Organization: | Technical University of Budapest
|
Lines: | 12
|
Message-ID: | <328B20BF.20EE@eik.bme.hu>
|
Reply-To: | solyom AT eik DOT bme DOT hu
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | falcon.fat.bme.hu
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Rubicant wrote:
> 2) More importantly, Allegro is basically stuck where it is. Mind you,
> it's got ALOT of functionality and great features as it is, but for it to
> remain as is is a shame.
Although I have downloaded Allegro, I have had no time yet to use it. So
my question is certainly a very stupid one for the rest of you, but
would you specify more exactly what features are missing from it ? It
can have bugs of course, and missing drivers for some of the sound and
video cards out there, but what else?
Andras
- Raw text -