From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
To:	mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: How to compile Allergo 2.1 under DJGPP
Date:	Fri, 25 Oct 1996 14:08:52 +0300 (GMT)
Message-ID:	<9610251409.aa05850@ailin.inti.edu.ar>

Hi here SET from Argentina:

>B. Peterson (bpeterson AT ntip DOT usps DOT gov) wrote:
>: I don't know much about Allergo but I'm using Jlib for somewhat the same
>: thing and it seems to work fine.  It has a good set of documentation too. 
>: I posted a message earlier asking what the differences are to the two
>: libraries but nobody has answered yet....    Anyway if you can't get it to
>: work you might try Jlib.  Hope this helps...
>In my personal opinion, Allegro is far superior to Jlib (I have used 
>both). Allegro has a wider variety of functions which are useful for more 
>purposes than those in Jlib. It does lack in documentation, but any docs 
>on this subject would have to be written at a very basic level, because 
>anyone sufficiently advanced can understand what the functions do either 
>from the list in allegro.txt or from the source code.
>The problem with compiling Allegro under DJGPP v2.01 has been dealt with 
>elsewhere on this group.

  I don't use any of these libs in my program, but if I remmember well the 
principal advantage of JLib is the cross platform features. If I'm no wrong 
JLib uses SVGALib in Linux to support the same things that the DOS version, 
that's important for the people that's thinking on multi-plataform soft.

SET

********************************************************************************
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) - salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar
Work: INTI (National Institute of Industrial Technology) Sector: ICE 
(Electronic Control & Instrumentation)
Post (Home): Curapaligue 2124 - Caseros (1678)- Buenos Aires - Argentina 

- Raw text -