www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/08/14/00:45:09

Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7226
From: stwand07 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: rand(), random() or libg++ Random ?
Date: 13 Aug 96 14:09:21 +0200
Organization: University of Cape Town
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <1996Aug13.140921@uctvms.uct.ac.za>
NNTP-Posting-Host: uctvms.uct.ac.za
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Hi

I am busy working on an optimisation program that makes extensive use of random
number (stochastic search). I have been using srand(time(NULL)) and rand() to
give random numbers in the range 0..1, which I then scale as required. I have
heard that rand() is not very good, so my questions are :
1. Is random() any better?
2. Are the libg++ Random classes better?

I need a normal distribution with zero mean, so 'better' refers to these
criteria.

Adios
Mark Wodrich.
UCT, Cape Town, South Africa.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019