Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:5213 comp.unix.programmer:19572
From:	ARING AT bmc DOT uu DOT se (Avi Ring)
Newsgroups:	comp.unix.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: best UNIX-->DOS porting compiler?
Date:	20 Jun 1996 09:25:44 GMT
Organization:	Physiology & Biophysics, Uppsala
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<4qb5eo$ps2@columba.udac.uu.se>
References:	<4q3ce3$o77 AT agate DOT berkeley DOT edu> <4q3uvh$ntu AT titan DOT saturn DOT net> <1996Jun19 DOT 174141 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	avi.medfys.uu.se
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <1996Jun19 DOT 174141 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za>, stwand07 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za 
says...
>
>In article <4q3uvh$ntu AT titan DOT saturn DOT net>, brian AT tcpip DOT geek DOT net (Brian 
Mitchell) writes:
>
>>>2)    Can I run DJGPP programs under a Win3.1 shell?  How bout a Win95
>>>      or a WinNT shell?
>> 
>> It might in Real mode 3.1 (is that still supported?) but if win 3.1 goes
>> into pmode, I'm almost 100% sure that djgpp compiled programs will not 
work.
>
>Lucky you said _almost_ 100%! DJGPP programs should work under Windows3.x/95
>depending on whether you need just text mode or graphics. Graphics under 
DPMI
>is tricky, and Windows is a buggy DPMI server anyway, but Grx2.0 works OK
>(there are other graphics libs too). So, depending on the graphics you 
require,
>the answer is definitely yes!
>
>Adios
>Mark.
>

What about about gnuplot ? Anybody know if it is ok with DJGPP and win95 or  
MSDOS ?

Avi Ring, Uppsala, Sweden

- Raw text -