Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:5091 comp.unix.programmer:19421
From:	brian AT tcpip DOT geek DOT net (Brian Mitchell)
Newsgroups:	comp.unix.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: best UNIX-->DOS porting compiler?
Date:	17 Jun 1996 15:52:17 GMT
Organization:	Saturn Internet - ISP
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<4q3uvh$ntu@titan.saturn.net>
References:	<4q3ce3$o77 AT agate DOT berkeley DOT edu>
Reply-To:	brian AT saturn DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Host:	tcpip.geek.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 17 Jun 1996 10:35:47 GMT, Allen Pouratian <allenp AT nima DOT eecs DOT berkeley DOT edu> wrote:
>I am porting a Unix (Linux) application to DOS so I can run it under
>a DOS shell under Windows 3.11.  Have I chosen the easiest path for porting
>by using Turbo C++ 3.0, or am I better off with another compiler?
>
>1)	Does gcc for dos exist?  Does the package come with the appropriate 
>	suite of unix like utilities?

Yes, as you are well aware of, since you reference it in #2. I don't know of
any other ports besides DJGPP though. What sort of utilities do you need?

>
>2)	Can I run DJGPP programs under a Win3.1 shell?  How bout a Win95
>	or a WinNT shell?

It might in Real mode 3.1 (is that still supported?) but if win 3.1 goes
into pmode, I'm almost 100% sure that djgpp compiled programs will not work.

>
>3)	Would Windows compilers like MSVC or Borland C++ for windows ease
>	my porting pains?  (Mostly getting a shareware tiff library written
>	with ANSI C working).
>

I think it depends on the specific program. If it is a X based program, the
windows interface might very well simplify things.

-- 
Brian Mitchell                          brian AT saturn DOT net
Unix Security / Perl / WWW / CGI        http://www.saturn.net/~brian 
"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell"
- H. Truman

- Raw text -