Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 1996 08:31:05 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Gregory Byrd <mouserd AT hargray DOT com>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: STUBIFY generates segment violation
In-Reply-To:	<31bce048.326526@news.hargray.com>
Message-Id:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.960612082228.6323H-100000@is>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, Gregory Byrd wrote:

> gcc -v  -o args args.c
> ..... extraneous output omitted ....
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You shouldn't usually do that.  You never know what that omitted output 
might say about your problem.

>  e:/progra~1/progra~1/gnuc~1/bin\cc1.exe
> e:/progra~1/progra~1/gnuc~1/tmp\cc01491
> 6 -fno-strength-reduce -quiet -dumpbase args.c -version -o
> e:/progra~1/progra~1/
> gnuc~1/tmp\cca14916
> GNU C version 2.6.3 (80386, BSD syntax) compiled by GNU C version 2.6.3.

GCC 2.6.3???  Can it be that you mix old v1.x gcc.exe and cc1.exe with 
the new v2.0 stubify?  If so, there is no way this will work for you, 
because v1.x programs (gcc.exe) cannot invoke v2 programs (stubify.exe).  
Please send the output of DIR when run on your DJGPP bin subdirectory.

If the above clue doesn't help, then please post the contents of your
environment in the DOS box.  That might tell something about the nature of
your problems.  Just type "set > env.lst" inside the DOS box where you run
DJGPP and post the contents of the file `env.lst'.  Thanks. 

- Raw text -