Message-Id:	<m0uJrcJ-001kAkC@desertoak.awa.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 16 May 96 11:12:35 +1000 (AEST)
From:	cjohns AT desertoak DOT awa DOT com DOT au (Chris Johns)
To:	A DOT APPLEYARD AT fs2 DOT mt DOT umist DOT ac DOT uk
CC:	DJGPP AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<157DDF4142@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk> (A.APPLEYARD@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk)
Subject:	Re: Unused functions

>>>>> "A.Appleyard" == A Appleyard <A DOT APPLEYARD AT fs2 DOT mt DOT umist DOT ac DOT uk> writes:

    A.Appleyard>   Caution: mark::replace(int,int) in KEYF.CC is
    A.Appleyard> never used (a) Caution: mark::rewrite(int,int) in
    A.Appleyard> KEYF.CC is only used in KEYF.CC (b)

    A.Appleyard>   (a) would tell me that that function can be
    A.Appleyard> removed, to reduce bulk.  (b) would tell me that
    A.Appleyard> that function could be declared `static'.

Does 'ld' support function level linking ?

Would it be a good idea to support function level linking ?

Chris Johns
AWA Networks for FDDI-2

- Raw text -