Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/04/28/14:38:43
Shawn Green wrote:
>
> I have the same problem when running under DOS. I do not, however, have any
> problem whatsoever when starting RHIDE from a DOS box under Win95.
>
> At 03:45 PM 4/26/96 +0200, you wrote:
> >DAVID HUELVES RAMOS wrote:
> >>
> >> Why is rhideb4 so slowwww!!!!! (in my 486 DX2 66 machine).
> >>
> >> thanks!
> >>
> >> David:
> e6737094 AT est DOT fib DOT upc DOT es
> >> :wq
> >I don't know. I have the same machine and it is fast. If you want to
> >get detailed answer, please put here a detailed question.
> >
> >Robert
> >--
> >*****************************************************************
> >* Robert Hoehne, Fakultaet fuer Mathematik, TU-Chemnitz-Zwickau *
> >* Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf *
> >* e-Mail: Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE *
> >* WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~rho *
> >*****************************************************************
> >
> >
>
> -Shawn Green
> Project Manager
> id Software
>
> Official release date for everything - "When it's done!"
> That's the only one you'll ever get.
i think it has something to do with csdpmi, when im in regulare dos, my progs
take a long time to load, it seems to page off the disk like a freak, but not
in windows, its weird......ps, cant wait until quake comes out.....
--
Jeremiah Zanin
<strider7 AT unm DOT edu>
- Raw text -