Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/04/26/02:38:41
On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, Orlando Andico wrote:
>
> > And yet another is to use Jed, or Emacs!!! (I prefer Jed because the
> > binary is quite small so you have more space for your compiler). The good
>
> Only if by ``space'' you mean disk space. If you mean the RAM, then the
> size of the program is not important, because the DPMI host will swap the
> editor (or a part thereof) out to make enough space for the compiler.
>
Actually I meant both... don't tell me that Emacs with its bloated binary
consumes less space than Jed... of course Jed can be a memory hog too
since it's a DJGPP-compiled program. But (unless I'm way off, correct me
if I'm wrong) a smaller binary means that much less memory consumed.
Which then translates to more memory for the compiler.
Cheers,
- Raw text -