Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 1996 11:48:29 -0600 (CST)
From:	Aaron Ucko <UCKO AT VAX1 DOT ROCKHURST DOT EDU>
Subject:	Re: Standard 32-bit libraries
To:	elf AT netcom DOT com
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<01I3X2XKRRSY0060YC@VAX1.ROCKHURST.EDU>
Organization:	Rockhurst College; Kansas City, MO
MIME-version:	1.0

>> >Good question.  It seems to me that going to ELF would be better since
>> >it is a better designed format than COFF.
>> 
>> Funny, I seem to recall you opposing ELF when it was last discussed.
>> 
>
>Are you punning [sic] me?  If not, I don't recall a conversation about
>ELF vs COFF.

I'm not punning you this time...but don't you remember when V2 was being 
planned one or two years ago, a discussion of whether or not DJGPP should
simultaneously switch to ELF.  Unless I am mistaken, you expressed opposition
and I made a lame pun about your not wanting an identifier collision.

>I've been looking at ELF format for other things and have grown to
>appreciate the layout.  COFF is very difficult to identify and parse,
>while ELF is designed to be revisioned.

Glad you've come around.  I guess the switch'll have to wait until V3,
though. :-(  (Or maybe not.  In the Linux binutils there is a script to
convert archives from a.out to ELF; perhaps it could be adapted for
use with DJGPP.)

-- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) | httyp!
"That's right," he said. "We're philosophers. We think, therefore we am."
-- Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_ | Geek Code 3.1 [for explanation, finger 
 hayden AT mankato DOT msus DOT edu]: GCS/M/S/C d- s: a18 C++(+++)>++++ UL++>++++ P++ 
 L++>+++++ E- W(-) N++(+) o+ K- w--- O M@ V-(--) PS++(+++) PE- Y(+) PGP(+) t(+)
 !5 X-- R(-) tv-@ b++(+++) DI+ !D-- G++(+++) e->+++++(*) h!>+ r-(--)>+++ y?

- Raw text -