Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/04/22/20:43:41
Reply to message 7007613 from ELIZ AT IS DOT ELTA. on 04/22/96 2:14AM
>Are your link times slow? How much time does the link stage take when
>linking a trivial ``Hello world'' program? (You can tell when the
>link stage begins by invoking gcc with -v switch and watching when it
>prints the line that calls ld.exe.)
I tried this, and combined with 'redir', it appears that out of the 12 seconds
of compilation, ld takes between 4 and 6 seconds. I don't know about
anybody else, but this is fine for me. :) (this is using a 64k buffer)
>Do you mean that if you stubedit some DJGPP programs to enlarge their
>transfer buffer, they crash? If so, please tell which programs are they.
>It is very frustrating to read a report that tells ``some programs crash,
>but I won't tell you which ones''. There might be serious bugs that wait
>to be solved, but nobody can even begin looking into that unless you
>provide the minimum details. Thanks.
Sorry. I did this quite a while ago and changed the ones that crashed back
to the original size, so it was impossible to figure out which ones they were.
If I recall correctly, it was 'cc1.exe' that displayed the aberrant behavior.
That was before I retrieved the Feb 22 releases though, so whatever the
problem was might have gone away already...
Anyway, I ran some (quick) tests after reading your post, and was unable to
recreate the crash. So far, I have stubedited the following programs to 64k:
cpp.exe, cc1.exe, gcc.exe, gdb.exe, grep.exe, ld.exe, and make.exe. I'll
keep them that way and if I run into any further problems I'll post a report
soonest. :)
John
- Raw text -