www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1748 |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
From: | peprbv AT cfa0 DOT harvard DOT edu (Bob Babcock) |
Subject: | Re: V2 and Ghostscript |
Message-ID: | <DnwpIA.2rK@cfanews.harvard.edu> |
Sender: | news AT cfanews DOT harvard DOT edu |
Reply-To: | rbabcock AT cfa DOT harvard DOT edu |
Organization: | Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA, USA |
References: | <313ED6FE DOT 446B AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Mar 1996 16:51:46 GMT |
Lines: | 7 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Thomas Demmer (demmer AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De) wrote: : How can I make gcc _not_ optimize the first example but still have : optimization on? I don't know if it will work here, but the usual way of telling a compiler not to optimize something is to declare the variables used in the expression as 'volatile.'
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |