Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/02/24/11:34:54
Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1388
|
From: | a920101 AT zipi DOT fi DOT upm DOT es
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | <None>
|
Date: | 23 Feb 96 13:56:03 +0100
|
Organization: | Facultad de Informatica - (UPM)
|
Lines: | 20
|
Message-ID: | <1996Feb23.135603@zipi.fi.upm.es>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | zipi.fi.upm.es
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Hi.
I've been out of this group for a month (those exams!) and have some
questions. Perhaps they've been answered thousands of times. Sorry then!
- I heard people complaining about DJGPP 2.0 being *much* slower than
1.112 (I mean the generated code, not the compile time).
Is it true? Why? Can it be avoided?
- I heard too that large compiles of C++ sources bomb DJGPP 2.0, this due
to a bug in CWSDPMI (I think...)
True? How Large?
- This is a stupid question: How can I get a random int in DJGPP?
Something like Random(int max_value)?
BTW: Big THANKS to all the people involved in DJGPP development.
Juanje.
- Raw text -