Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:46:39 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Wonkoo Kim <wkim+@pitt.edu>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why bigger exe size with LIBGRX+BCC2GRX v2.0?
In-Reply-To:	<4gbefk$8u8@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>
Message-Id:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.960220174310.1163J-100000@is>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On 20 Feb 1996, Wonkoo Kim wrote:

> I remember that we said v2.0 would occupy less memory by removing
> go32 and taking DPMI scheme.  Is it still a valid statement even though libc 
> got larger by moving some go32 functions into it?  (when assuming that 
> we had "v2.0 with go32" for the same gcc and libraries.)

This statement was and is valid, but it mainly refers to the conventional 
memory (below 640K mark), which is a precious resource on any DOS 
machine.  I don't think anybody was as scrupulous about extended memory, 
where a few KBs don't make much of a difference.  The code that in v1.x 
resided in the conventional memory (as part of go32) is now a part of 
your executable image in the extended memory.

- Raw text -