Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1242
From:	wkim+@pitt.edu (Wonkoo Kim)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Why bigger exe size with LIBGRX+BCC2GRX v2.0?
Date:	17 Feb 1996 04:49:36 GMT
Organization:	University of Pittsburgh
Lines:	18
Distribution:	world
Message-ID:	<4g3mp0$qit@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>
Reply-To:	wkim+@pitt.edu (Wonkoo Kim)
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ehdup-c3-8.rmt.net.pitt.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

I don't know if this is due to djgpp v2.0, or due to its graphics libraries.
I'm wondering why I have much bigger exe size with v2.0 than v1.x.

My graphics program compiled with v1.x (v1.12?) was 146KB, but for 
the same sources, newly compiled exe with v2.0 is 210KB.   I noticed
v2.0 beta gave me much bigger size (217KB), but I just thought that
libraries of beta version might not be optimized.  The released version
gave me 7KB smaller than beta, but I don't quite understand why
I still have much bigger .exe size.  I striped off the symbols from .exe 
and all compilation options (-O2) were the same for those .exes.
(Used libraries are libgrx, bcc2grx, libm, and the graphics program
 use bcc2grx much as it's an image viewer and does some processing.)

Any comments?

//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Wonkoo Kim (wkim+@pitt.edu)

- Raw text -