Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/02/18/02:59:24
On Wed, 14 Feb 1996, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> right now. The bad news is that I never bothered to implement it for
> CWSDPMI (see all the bad things I never tell you about ;-) so you must
> use the XMS type solution (if you need LOTS of DMA buffers) or DOS memory
> if you can get by with it, or use something more professional :-)
That is true when running CWSDPMI on a pure DOS system, but when a memory
manager like EMM386 or QEMM is installed, isn't it true that VDS is
served by that manager? AFAIK, every memory manager out there supports
the VDS API nowadays.
- Raw text -