Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 1996 23:15:11 -0500
From:	dj (DJ Delorie)
To:	oandico AT eee DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SOL.3.91.960213113253.1422B-100000@gollum> (message from Orlando Andico on Tue, 13 Feb 1996 11:34:50 -0800 (GMT))

> Could someone enlighten me about the level of POSIX compliance in DJGPP 
> v2? I have to admit, the signals are pretty nice. How many of the signals 
> are supported?

V2's goal was posix compatibility.  At the compile and link level,
except for serial line functions, it's 100% compatible.  At the
runtime level, there are a few pieces of functionality that are not
implemented, because they're just too hard in DOS.  Signals are
probably one of them.  Fork() is another.

I suspect with time and effort, these final pieces can be dealt with
as well.

- Raw text -